.

Divorce Allegedly Behind Killing, Corpse Torching

Roberto Gallardo Aguilar could face 25 years to life in prison if convicted of the May 22, 2009, death of 22-year-old Sharon Elizabeth Contreras.

Jury selection got under way today for the trial of a man who allegedly killed his wife and set her body ablaze in Lake Elsinore because she was divorcing him.

Roberto Gallardo Aguilar could face 25 years to life in prison if convicted of the May 22, 2009, death of 22-year-old Sharon Elizabeth Contreras.

Riverside County Superior Court Judge Albert Wojcik summoned more than 100 prospective jurors to his Murrieta courtroom for screening as to their availability and qualifications.

Jury selection was scheduled to continue tomorrow, with opening statements expected on Monday.

Aguilar remains in custody in lieu of $1 million bail at the Southwest Detention Center in Murrieta.

According to a trial brief filed by Deputy District Attorney Chris Peuvrelle, Aguilar, now 29, and Contreras were in the midst of a divorce when she was killed.

Witnesses told sheriff's investigators that Aguilar stated on several occasions that "he would rather see Sharon dead than with someone else," according to the brief.

Aguilar also allegedly bragged to a friend that he had abused Contreras, stabbing her in the stomach with a knife and inflicting other wounds, the court papers state.

In the seven months before her death, the victim received medical treatment for unexplained injuries on multiple occasions, but never blamed Aguilar, according to the prosecution.

The couple, who had a son together, separated about a month before Contreras was killed, after she served him with divorce papers.

Around 1:45 on the morning of the murder, the defendant left his job at a Garden Grove club without saying where he was going, Peuvrelle said.

According to the prosecutor, Aguilar drove to Lake Elsinore, where Contreras was living in her father's house on Amorose Drive. Peuvrelle alleged that during a confrontation, the defendant smothered his wife to death.

The defendant allegedly took the body to a deserted area near Temescal Canyon and Jeff roads and set it aflame. Passing motorists thought there was a small brush fire and called 911, leading to the discovery of Contreras' partially burned remains.

Four days later, Aguilar allegedly told a friend, Luis Sandoval, that he had gotten into a fight with Contreras and she was "La chinge," which roughly translated from Spanish means "I (expletive) her up."

The defendant reported his wife missing to Garden Grove police, telling an investigator that he and the victim had gotten into an argument over $50, and she ran away with a blanket, taking nothing else with her, according to the prosecution.

During a later interview with a Riverside County sheriff's detective, Aguilar acknowledged that he had told Sandoval that he had killed Contreras, but didn't mean what he said, the prosecutor alleged.

According to the brief, cell phone records confirmed the defendant was in Lake Elsinore immediately before and after Contreras' death.

Megan Batson January 19, 2012 at 02:44 AM
Okay this happen in 2009 and now he is going to trial, wow another piece of crap in the system!!!
THE REAL Anita Drink January 19, 2012 at 06:38 AM
Eeeeewwww... corpse torching. That is simply nasty. But I am fascinated/horrified with the la chinge comment. What a total spic.
Vince January 19, 2012 at 07:04 AM
Anita Darlin'! Consistency is an admirable quality---So I do wonder, have ya ever met a Spic that you DID like? You could be fairly charaterized as "the flip side" of Will Roger's, huh? You do crack me up! Thanks for the chuckle...
THE REAL Anita Drink January 19, 2012 at 02:58 PM
When I first read this article title, I read it as 'corpse touching' instead of 'corpse torching' - and I cracked myself up. And yes, I have met several spics that I have liked.
Vince January 19, 2012 at 07:16 PM
Anita....you reminded me of that Sam Kinison routine about "corpse touching"...Well, it was sorta about "touching"---But his story had a "twist" to it. That story of his caused a lot of grief for him, since Gay Activist's didn't quite see the "humor" of it all, as he did, and as most witnssess of his "reinactment" did too---funny thing is though, his story was based on FACT...but of course, "facts" bear NO consideration when it comes to "activist's", ya know?
THE REAL Anita Drink January 19, 2012 at 08:03 PM
Vince, I didn't remember Sams bit until you just brought it up. Funny stuff as I totally dig un PC humor. I just laughed out loud watching it again on YouTube. Could Sam have been one of the first plankers?
Vince January 20, 2012 at 12:27 AM
Anita, why not share Sam in all his glory!! ***WARNING*** CLICK at yer own peril, Sam was definitely NOT for the faint of heart: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrNa8EAjgCA
Vince January 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM
And he was right...IT NEVER ENDS!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »