This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

'Light Trespassing' Requires More 'Comprehensive Thought'

The board scheduled another public hearing on the proposal for Nov. 22.

A proposal to impose fines up to $500 on residents or businesses whose outdoor lights create a nuisance could have "unintended consequences" that result in penalties against operations that need overnight illumination for efficiency and safety, a Riverside County supervisor said today.

"I know we want to get this ordinance on the books soon, but there are a number of unintended consequences that may require more comprehensive thought," Supervisor Jeff Stone said of the "light trespass" measure proposed by Supervisor John Tavaglione.

Tavaglione was absent from this afternoon's hearing due to work-related travel. The board scheduled another public hearing on the proposal for Nov. 22.

Find out what's happening in Lake Elsinore-Wildomarwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Stone said constituents in his district had expressed concerns about the impact of the ordinance on their businesses. One issue of significance was nighttime illumination for Temecula-area wine growers. Stone said vineyards often have to deploy workers to pick grapes in the middle of the night, and they use what might be comparable to athletic field lighting.

According to the supervisor, homeowners' associations and community centers are also worried about being fined for running high-intensity security lights.

Find out what's happening in Lake Elsinore-Wildomarwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"There are many shopping centers throughout the county with bright lights," Stone said. "The way this ordinance reads, many shopping centers will not be in compliance."

He asked that "appropriate" exemptions be incorporated in the proposed measure.

Tavaglione said last month that the ordinance would provide the county with the necessary tools "to deal with individuals who want to harass neighbors through lighting, or who have lighting in place that impacts communities."

The proposal would set penalties for property owners who allow their exterior "luminaires" to shine too brightly, infringing on neighbors' lots. Tavaglione said excess lighting not only wastes resources but can also "jeopardize the health, safety and welfare" of those exposed.

Corona-area resident William Larsen inspired the supervisor to start researching a light trespass law more than a year ago when he presented photos to the board demonstrating how a neighbor's security lights were illuminating the second-floor of his home every night, all night.

"It all boils down to a big light in my face," Larsen said today. "I'd like to have it so that I never have to see it again."

The proposed ordinance stipulates that all outdoor light fixtures "shall be located, adequately shielded and directed such that no direct light falls outside the parcel of origin, or onto the public right-of-way" and "shall not blink, flash or rotate."

Exceptions would be made for street lights and lights utilized by public safety agencies, as well as lights used for public or private monuments and those activated for special occasions.

A complaint of light trespass would have to be filed with the sheriff's or code enforcement departments, whose personnel would conduct a follow-up investigation to confirm a violation.

The first two violations in a six-month period would be classified as infractions. A third offense in a six-month period would be treated as a misdemeanor, according to Tavaglione.

The minimum fine for a first offense would be $100. The penalty for a second offense would be $250, and the penalty for three or more offenses would be $500 -- with the possibility of up to six months in county jail, the supervisor said.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?