It's curtains for redevelopment funds in Lake Elsinore and Wildomar.
A recent state Supreme Court decision will likely force the cities to close their redevelopment agencies, which dole out money for projects designed to bring new business into town.
California justices decided Thursday morning the state has a right to seize more than $1 billion in redevelopment agency funds, putting about 400 agencies in jeopardy.
The decision comes months after state legislators approved a plan to force agencies to turn over huge sums of money or face closure. Seizing the redevelopment funds was just one piece in a larger plan by the legislature to recall money from local governments and use it to fill the state's yawning deficit.
In the case CRA v. Matosantos, the Court also struck down the separate law that would have allowed redevelopment agencies to fund local projects if they paid into state coffers.
A Blow To Local Development
Local leaders said the decision was a blow to business development, but affirmed their commitment to find new ways to excite investment.
City council members in Lake Elsinore and Wildomar to recall redevelopment funds, by officials.
Lake Elsinore Councilwoman Melissa Melendez said the legislature's decision to seize funds was a sign of the deep malaise overcoming Sacramento.
"What it says is they're incapable of balancing the budget within normal means, and now they're turning and taking it off the backs of their cities," Melendez said.
Lake Elsinore redevelopment funds were slated for use in building Pottery Court, . Money from the fund was also used to .
Justin Carlson, city manager for redevelopment in Lake Elsinore, said city staff was reviewing the court decision and would have to comply with whatever the state demanded.
"We're going to have to follow what the law says," Carlson said.
The agency has stopped preparing new projects, Carlson said. Projects already under construction would still receive funding, he said.
Melendez said council members would find another way to bring in business.
"Really, what we need to do is just start engaging the development community and the private investors more and give them any incentive we can," she said.
In a written statement, the CRA and League of California Cities vowed to continue the fight to save redevelopment and called for their own special legislation that would re-establish redevelopment in California.
"Without immediate legislative action to fix this adverse decision, this ruling is a tremendous blow to local job creation and economic advancement," wrote CRA Board President Julio Fuentes in the statement.
"The legislative record is abundantly clear that legislators did not intend to abolish redevelopment. We hope to work with state lawmakers to come up with a way to restore redevelopment."
Hazel Lodevico-To'o contributed to this report.