Wildomar Aims To Open Parks Without 'Mello Roos' Tax

The city is moving forward on a November ballot initiative.

The City of Wildomar will once again be asking residents whether they are willing to pay an annual $28 special tax to pay for their parks – but this time around, things will be a little different: There will be no community facilities district or Mello Roos tax.

In a 4-0 vote Wednesday night, Wildomar City Council directed staff to pull the trigger and begin the process of putting together another parks initiative for the November ballot. It will ask voters whether they'll pay the special tax to fund maintenance of the city’s three parks: Marna O’Brien, Windsong and Heritage.

In a unanimous vote, council members rejected a resolution to form a community facilities district (CFD) to levy the annual $28 tax, and instead opted for a yearly parcel tax in the same amount.

To get the ball rolling, however, the city will first make sure voters want parks: It will invest up to $15,000 to pay a professional polling service to survey residents and find out what the level of support would be for a ballot initiative.

“Last time we flew blind … and we got 56 (percent),” Mayor Ben Benoit said.

Windsong and Heritage parks closed as a result.

There were no surveys conducted last time around, but this year, if poll results are favorable, the city will take steps to move forward.

Cost to Wildomar to get a measure on the November ballot is expected to be around $43,000, possibly more, not including the polling cost or an additional $10,000 proposed for voter information and education outreach, according to Assistant City Manager Gary Nordquist.

Already, the proposal has cost the city $13,000 in legal and associated fees.

In addition to polling residents, the city is proposing to put a $28 parcel tax to the voters instead of the CFD tax.

“It’s still a special tax,” argued Councilwoman Marcia Swanson, a critic of the

“They are like dirty words,” she said of Mello Roos. “It scared every one of you.”

Several in the audience of approximately 50 people gave public comment Wednesday night, and many said they would prefer a parcel tax over a CFD.

Wildomar resident Gil Rasmussen was a Measure D opponent. He told council members Wednesday that he could get behind a 2012 ballot measure if it were in the form of a parcel tax. However, he have criticized the city's willingness to spend money on an initiative that closely parallels a measure that voters turned down just last year.

According to Nordquist, under the parcel tax structure Wildomar property owners would be taxed annually $28 per parcel, regardless of how many dwellings were on a property.

Under a CFD, Wildomar property owners would be required to pay the annual $28 tax per unit or dwelling.

Using the parcel tax model compared to a CFD, Nordquist said the city would see approximately $20,000 less per year in revenues based on current build out. The parcel tax would generate in the ballpark of $330,000, which is still greater than the approximately $225,000 needed to fund parks’ maintenance, Nordquist said.

Another difference with this year’s proposal compared to Measure D is the annual tax rate would remain steady at $28 and not fluctuate based on the consumer price index, according to Nordquist.

For the nearly 20 people who gave public comment Wednesday night, the majority said they wanted to keep the parks open and they urged the city to make it happen.

“I don’t care (how),” said Wildomar resident Ray Addington. “Please find a way to fund our parks.”

Councilman Bob Cashman was absent Wednesday night.

Robert Lougee June 30, 2012 at 06:32 PM
Michael, This lighting thing happened several years ago. For the record, I do not fault the recreational leagues for anything. In fact, WLL was very cooperative and worked with my daughters team quite a bit. My issue is solely with the way the City Council treats the Rec Leagues. Having been around organized youth sports for more than a decade, the one constant issue has always been finding enough field time. There simply isn't an abundance of facilities. When the recreational leagues are given first rite of refusal to all of the available facilities in the city and better rates for these amenities, conflict and bitterness are bound to ensue. I have seen other local cities give preference to the adult leagues. What I am saying is this is not an isolated issue. If there can't be equality then I will have to vote no for a park fee.
teenliberal7 July 01, 2012 at 07:28 AM
@Thomas Blair, could not have said it better myself!
Martha L. Bridges July 01, 2012 at 01:45 PM
What a pack of nonsensical statements. You simply don't know what you are talking about. I personally donated $130 to the parks fund, and while I don't volunteer for the parks, I do volunteer 20 to 30 hours per week to other worthy causes and organizations - I have given my time and support for volunteer efforts for the last 50 + years. How dare you criticize me or the other people you have named simply because YOU want us to support the parks? We all get to make a personal choice in these matters. It is not sinful to have concentrated on paying our bills on time, not having our homes foreclosed or that our cars are paid for...geez Michelle that's called good, old fashioned thrift and responsible financial behavior. The community, the county, the state and the whole country would all be in better shape if they had practiced more prudent financial management. What makes you and others feel entitled to tell anybody what they are obligated to volunteer for, supply or support? You are really out of line in saying such things. Volunteering by definition implys making a personal choice, and many people choose to give their time, effort and money to something else.
Martha L. Bridges July 03, 2012 at 06:04 PM
I'm not interested in doing "battle" with anyone. I am commenting to express my opinions and concerns. It's a shame that there are so many people wanting to hid behind their faceless keyboards and turn what should be an exchange of ideas into a battle.
Cat July 03, 2012 at 06:46 PM
I wonder Martha, is there a way that you can express your own opinions & ideas WITHOUT bringing other commenters names into it? Just wondering.........


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »