Wildomar Now Included In Flood Discussion

Today the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved a resolution that would potentially see the cities of Murrieta, Temecula and Wildomar, as well as officials from the county, working together to oversee modifications along Murrieta Creek.

Wildomar has a place at the table if it chooses.

Today, Riverside County supervisors voted today to establish a five-way governing board to oversee modifications along Murrieta Creek to prevent a repeat of a disastrous flood along the waterway almost 20 years ago.

Supervisor Jeff Stone's resolution to form a Murrieta Creek Joint Powers Authority was approved in a 4-0 vote; Supervisor Marion Ashley was absent.

The JPA would include representatives from the county and the cities of Murrieta, Temecula and Wildomar, as well as officials from the county Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

Each of the cities has to individually pass a resolution agreeing to participate in the JPA, the purpose of which would be to prioritize and manage planned improvements along a seven-mile stretch of the creek that traverses both Murrieta and Temecula – improvements that could potentially affect water flow in Wildomar.

When the agenda for today’s Board of Supervisor’s meeting was posted last week, Wildomar was not part of the discussion.

With today’s news, Benoit said he was pleased that the proposed JPA now includes Wildomar.

“This is a positive move by the county. The work needs to be done and we can't keep waiting on the federal government,” he added.

Benoit said although Wildomar has been invited to participate, his fellow council members will have to decide whether they want to be part of the board.

“I’m just one vote; there are five of us,” he said, noting that the issue will be put on a future city council agenda.

"This (project) will provide the important public safety infrastructure we need in Southwest Riverside County," said Stone, whose district encompasses the Temecula and Murrieta area. "We're due for a big flood."

In mid-January 1993, several days of heavy rains caused the creek to overflow, flooding surrounding homes and businesses, resulting in fatalities and roughly $100 million in damage.

"There was four feet of water in Old Town (Temecula)," Stone said. "There was anger and angst in the community because the federal government had not allowed us to go into the creek and remove growth and debris that caused dams to form. That's why it overflowed."

Following the flood, federal officials permitted debris removal and also drew up a four-phase plan to dredge and widen the channel to prevent a similar occurrence, Stone said. However, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has yet to proceed with the $55 million project for lack of funding.

"Residents in Temecula and Murrieta have properties that are technically in a flood plain. They're paying exorbitant taxes to FEMA every year," Stone said, noting that despite the money going into federal coffers, Congress is not allocating funds for creek improvements.

The supervisor said the federal government previously committed to covering 65 percent of the project costs.

In the last decade, only a half-mile portion of the creek's downstream end has been fortified.

"Phases two and three are critical to abating a natural disaster," Stone said.

He said the Flood Control and Water Conservation District has $32 million in taxpayer funds set aside for creek improvements, and there's no time to waste putting the money to work.

Meadowbrook resident Gary Grant objected to spending "millions of dollars" to protect homes and businesses that were knowingly constructed in a flood plain.

"If you build there, that's what happens," Grant said. "At least I had the common sense to live an area that wouldn't get flooded."

If created, the Murrieta Creek Joint Powers Authority would decide how to acquire additional funding for the project, which would take around seven to 10 years to complete. Stone said the goal is to begin soliciting bids from contractors to work on creek upgrades by no later than the middle of 2013.

A draft JPA agreement will be drawn up by the Office of County Counsel after the cities of Murrieta, Temecula and Wildomar pass their own resolutions, according to Stone. –City News Service and Toni McAllister contributed to this report.

Ken Mayes May 08, 2012 at 10:45 PM
Here goes more money down stream for something that proper planning would have prevented.
WHAT?? May 09, 2012 at 03:21 AM
Baby Ben is still jumping up and down like a small child insisting on his way. I'll say it again: educate yourself before you open your mouth, Ben. You have no idea of the history of this issue in Wildomar, Murrieta or Temecula -- nor do you have an inkling of the current issues in our City. Gary Andre (voluntarily) has been working for months mapping all existing creeks, pipes, measuring sizes of all pipes (working with our Public Works Director, Tim D'Zmura). What he has found is in some instances, the County's map is not correct: the piping they show in some cases does not even exist. Ben, talk to Gary. . .he can explain it to you. To resolve the issues in Wildomar, there is no need to join a JPA with Murrieta and Temecula, There is a much simpler solution for Wildomar available under the Safety Element of our General Plan. Oh, I forgot you've never read the General Plan. Sheryl Ade
Martha L. Bridges May 09, 2012 at 02:04 PM
For those of you who don't know, the long planned flood containment modifications along Murrieta Creek that took around 20 years of contentious planning before being approved STOP at Tenaja Road, which is well down stream from the area that is of concern to Wildomar and Murrieta along the border that separates the two cities. Some of you might find it helpful to look at the Wildomar West Flood Zone Map for this part of Wildomar. It is subject to flooding even in near drought conditions: http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/swcounty/region-stone-proposes-takeover-of-murrieta-creek-project/article_2537619a-252d-59bd-b929-bd7b083bdb88.html While the Northern part of Murrieta and Southern part of Wildomar have been and potentially would be impacted by flooding, there was never any approved plan to include these areas in the original, approved project - and there was never any funding to cover any work in the area. You can see a map of the approved project at: http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/swcounty/region-stone-proposes-takeover-of-murrieta-creek-project/article_2537619a-252d-59bd-b929-bd7b083bdb88. If Ben Benoit had reviewed this information, he would understand why Wildomar was not originally invited to join the JPA and understand that it will be of no immediate benefit to Wildomar's flooding problems to become part of this new JPA. JPA involvement will be used to promote a ambious politician eager to milk his current position for personal gain.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »